Network for Public Education to our Friends and Allies in California: Support Sherlett Hendy Newbill for LAUSD School Board

NPE to our Friends and Allies in California: Support Sherlett Hendy Newbill for LAUSD School Board As a friend of Network for Public Education, you understand the importance of supporting candidates for public office who will work to protect, preserve, promote, and strengthen public schools. In California, an important election will be settled on June 3rd. In the Los Angeles School Board race, Sherlett Hendy Newbill has earned NPE's endorsement.  Hendy Newbill is a teacher, a coach and a parent who grew up in District 1 as the daughter of immigrants who struggled to put food on the table for their five children. She attended elementary, middle and high school in District 1. After graduating from Susan Miller Dorsey High School, Hendy Newbill received a scholarship to attend Xavier University in New Orleans. She later returned to Los Angeles to raise a family in the neighborhood in which she was raised and to teach in the school she attended. NPE endorsed Hendy Newbill because of her commitment to high quality neighborhood schools. She said, "I have worked with teachers, parents and community members for 16 years to improve schools, stop budget cuts, stop school closures and reconstitutions." As an educator and a mother, Hendy Newbill stands out among the field of candidates. She said, "Our public school system is under attack. I am the only candidate who is not a politician and not tied in with the corporate reform movement." In keeping with her commitment to community, Hendy Newbill will fight to protect and build up public schools. When elected, she will work to create a Family Center network, which will provide wraparound services for the community.       When asked about school closures, Hendy Newbill said, "When the school I teach at was threatened with being closed or reconstituted, I organized with teachers, parents, alumni and the community to stop this at my school and to put a moratorium on school closures in LA because closing schools is horrible for students and communities. Don't shut down schools. Give them what they need." On the topic of testing, she said, "Students are more than a test score. Testing should be one of many components used to evaluate students. As a teacher in the trenches of our schools, I know first hand that when teachers focus only on raising test scores, they narrow the curriculum, focus too much on test prep and the students suffer.  We need a school board member that gets this." The Network for Public Education only endorses candidates who have made a strong commitment to public education. We don't have the kind of money that allows us to compete financially with the billionaires. But with a strong network of parents, students, teachers, and public education advocates, we inspire our allies to take part in the democratic process and support the best candidates. It is projected that there will be a low turnout in this election and NPE encourages those who value public education to get out and vote for Sherlett Hendy Newbill on June 3rd. You may not live in Los Angeles, but we ask that you share this message with friends in L.A.. For more information about Sherlett Hendy Newbill, check outhendynewbill.com. For more information about the Network for Public Education, go to networkforpubliceducation.org. WE ARE MANY. THERE IS STRENGTH IN OUR NUMBERS. TOGETHER WE WILL SAVE OUR SCHOOLS.

Marshall Tuck and his policies repeatedly FAILED Los Angeles Students. Let's stop him from FAILING all of California

Marshall Tuck and his policies repeatedly FAILED Los Angeles Students. Let's stop him from FAILING all of California. pic.twitter.com/Fh5H1fKoZm

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 31, 2014

통합교육구-1지구, 교사/학부모/코치, 셜렛 헨디 뉴빌 (Sherlett Hendy Newbill)

통합교육구-1지구, 교사/학부모/코치, 셜렛 헨디 뉴빌 (Sherlett Hendy Newbill) #LAUSD http://t.co/Ry1YzsRflc http://t.co/eAbki3c0GW

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 31, 2014

셜렛 헨디 뉴빌 (Sherlett Hendy Newbill)

Marshall Tuck's legacy of institutional racism at Markham MS so bad, that U.S. Congress expresses concern

Marshall Tuck's legacy of institutional racism at Markham MS so bad, that U.S. Congress expresses concern #LAUSD http://t.co/3uuDvcRgHB

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 29, 2014

Marshall Tuck's legacy of institutional racism at Markham MS is so bad, that congresspeople are now concerned. Representative Janice Hahn wrote LAUSD to contact the Partnership for Los Angeles Schools (PLAS) about safety and push-out concerns that are the legacy of Marshall Tuck's unilateral leadership style and hierarchy of administration. Tuck was also known for shutting down Ethnic Studies, Heritage Language, and Dual Language Immersion Programs.

---

Marshall Tuck's legacy of institutional racism at Markham MS so bad, that congresspeople are expressing con... by Robert D. Skeels

Marshall Tuck's Dropout Factories

Marshall Tuck's Dropout Factories by Robert D. Skeels

Marshall Tuck, who ran Mayor Villaraigosa's 15 schools and compiled a mediocre and unimpressive record. He has also been president of the Green Dot charter chain. — Professor Diane Ravitch

Having to take remedial high school courses after arriving at the university is also very demoralizing for students. Many end up dropping out. The California State University tracks the number of matriculates that make it to their second year. Tuck's Animo Inglewood Charter students had a CSU drop out rate of 55 percent in 2008. That same year saw the Tuck managed Animo Leadership Charter students drop out from the CSU at a staggering 68 percent!

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2004 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	31%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2005 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	44%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2006 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	47%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2007 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	57%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2008 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	68%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	52%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	29%
Animo Leadership Charter High School 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	37%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2005 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	43%
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2006 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	52%
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2007 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	47%
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2008 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	55%
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	20%
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	13%
Animo Inglewood Charter High School 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	20%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High School 2007 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	62%
Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High School 2008 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	32%
Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High School 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	18%
Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High School 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	27%
Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter High School 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	31%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Animo Venice Charter High School 2008 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	22%
Animo Venice Charter High School 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	43%
Animo Venice Charter High School 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	38%
Animo Venice Charter High School 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	29%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Animo South Los Angeles Charter High School 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	50%
Animo South Los Angeles Charter High School 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	46%
Animo South Los Angeles Charter High School 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	59%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Jordan High School Partnership Academy 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	38%
Jordan High School Partnership Academy 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	52%
Jordan High School Partnership Academy 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	40%
Jordan High School Partnership Academy 2012 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	41%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Roosevelt Senior High School 2009 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	20%
Roosevelt Senior High School 2010 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	31%
Roosevelt Senior High School 2011 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	44%
Roosevelt Senior High School 2012 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	22%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Graduates from Marshall Tuck led High Schools Dropping out of CSU after Freshman Year
Mendez High School for College and Career Prep 2012 Admits to CSU First Year Dropouts	27%
Data Tables: http://j.mp/TUCK_FAIL | http://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck-unqualified/

Ben Austin's Wall Street buddies are profiting off student loan debt

Make massive profits off of college loans. Reinvest those funds on the trigger-happy Parent Revolution to privatize local K-12 schools—providing more profits from the charter-sector periphery. Rinse and repeat.

SKrashen: The problem is not a lack of technology. The problem is poverty.

SKrashen: The problem is not a lack of technology. The problem is poverty: Comment on " Education Needs to Change as Fast as Technology," by Zack Sims. Posted at http://www.forbes.c...

Congratulations Sherlett Hendy Newbill on receiving the LAUSD endorsement by Dr. Diane Ravitch's Network Public Education

Congratulations Sherlett Hendy Newbill on receiving the #LAUSD endorsement by Dr. @DianeRavitch's @NetworkPublicEd! http://t.co/cMMmwkqwhs

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 23, 2014

Dr. Diane Ravitch's Network for Public Education endorses Sherlett Hendy Newbill for LAUSD by Robert D. Skeels

Activists protest Marshall Tuck's racist push-out policies still in place at Markham MS

Activists protest Marshall Tuck's racist push-out policies still in place at Markham MS #LAUSD http://t.co/33FaGashak pic.twitter.com/gmg5IK7PKP

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 21, 2014

For more on Marshall Tuck's racist career: Marshall Tuck's Legacy of Bigotry and Failure

For more on the Markham MS Protest: Markham MS Community to Protest PLAS Policies started under Marshall Tuck

Schools Matter: Marshall Tuck's Legacy of Bigotry and Failure

Schools Matter: Marshall Tuck's Legacy of Bigotry and Failure http://t.co/Q1T7nezPMz #LAUSD pic.twitter.com/C6X57iJCwh

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 21, 2014

Tomorrow Markham MS Community to Protest PLAS Policies started under Marshall Tuck

Tomorrow Markham MS Community to Protest PLAS Policies started under Marshall Tuck #LAUSD http://t.co/KZnPKInIRv pic.twitter.com/8puEprlUZ2

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 21, 2014

Markham MS Community to Protest PLAS Policies started under Marshall Tuck

Markham PLAS Protest Marshall Tuck Policies Press Conference Flyer

Californians, here's crucial evidence of Marshall Tuck's record of failure

Marshall Tuck's Legacy of Failure and Bigotry: Data from his Green Dot and PLAS tenures.

Eli Broad's Marshall Tuck is a candidate for the California State Superintendent of Instruction seat in the June's election. Aside from his abject record of shutting down heritage language and ethnic studies programs, his tenure as "CEO" at both Green Dot Public [sic] Schools, and The Partnership for Los Angeles Schools (PLAS) was, as Professor Ravitch charitably put it, a "mediocre and unimpressive record". The truth is it's much worse than that. In researching for an article on Tuck, even I have been astonished by just how bad his schools fare. Green Dot Charter Corporation's trademark slogan cites preparing students to be "successful in college, leadership, and life" — clearly the former is not true. The data is so damning, that I'm publicizing it prior to writing my article. While it's still a work in progress, the numbers compiled already are remarkable. Here is the link to the spreadsheet. Please feel free to copy any and all of the information (it all comes from public sources to begin with) and let people know about this privatizer who claims to have "turned around" dozens of California schools.

Marshall Tuck's Legacy of Failure and Bigotry: Data from his Green Dot and PLAS tenures.

LAUSD Candidate Sherlett Hendy Newbill Speaks at the SLASD Rally

Sherlett Hendy Newbill speaking at the Schools Los Angeles Students Deserve (SLASD) Rally on 8-May-2014. Mother/teacher/Coach Hendy Newbill is a candidate for the District 1 seat of the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board of Education. http://hendynewbill.com

SLASD Community rally for an authentic voice in the LAUSD LCFF/LCAP process!

 How do YOU want LAUSD to spend YOUR $$$?

standardized tests? iPads? consultants?

or 

full-time nurses, psychologists, counselors???

psychiatric social workers?

librarians, art , music, P.E teachers????

adult education, pre-K??

other services?

March and Rally TOMORROW!!!

 May 8th, 4:30 p.m.

RFK Community School

701 S. Catalina St.

Los Angeles, 90005

Meet at 4:30

Parking available at RFK Community

(Entrance to parking lot on Catalina or parking garage on 8th St.)

March to corner of Wilshire and Vermont

If you can't make it at 4:30, 

meet at corner of Wilshire and Vermont at 5:00 p.m.

right outside Metro Station (Red/Purple Line)

If you can't make it at all, find someone who can, and 

Spread the Word!

We can quietly agonize 

or ACTIVELY ORGANIZE!

You Choose!

¡ATENCIÓN PADRES DE FAMILIA!

¿Como quiere que el LAUSD gaste nuestro $$$?

¿en exámenes inútiles? ¿en iPads? ¿en consultantes inútiles?

o

¿enfermeras, psicólogos, consejeros por tiempo completo?

¿trabajadores sociales psiquiátricos?

¿bibliotecarios, maestros de arte, música y gimnasia?

¿más clases para adultos?

¿más maestros de pre-kinder?

¿otros servicios?

¡VENGAN A UNA MARCHA Y MANIFESTACIÓN EN 5 DÍAS!

El día jueves, 8 de mayo a las 4:30

RFK Community School

701 S. Catalina St.

Los Ángeles 90010

(en la esquina de la Calle 7 y la Catalina)

Nos reunimos a las 4:30 en la RFK Community School

Hay estacionamiento en la RFK Community School en la entrada de la Calle 8

Al reunirnos, vamos a hacer la marcha hasta la esquina de Wilshire y Vermont (solo a 4 cuadras)

Si no puede llegar a las 4:30 en la RFK Community School

Unase con nosotros a las 5:00 en la esquina de Wilshire y Vermont

en frente de la estación del Metro (Línea Roja/Morada)

Si no puede participar, encuentre una persona que si puede 

y animarle a presentarse y 

¡PASAR LA VOZ!

Podemos sufrir en silencio 

u ¡ORGANIZARNOS CON GANAS!

La opción es nuestra

Local Accountability and Astroturf: Local Control without the Local Control

First published May 5, 2014 on Cloaking Inequity
By Robert D. Skeels

---

"Most Americans say they support equal funding for public schools, but affluent and powerful citizens often oppose efforts to correct funding inequities. This opposition may reflect ignorance about funding differences, unthinking acceptance of traditional methods for funding education, and selfish desires to keep personal taxes low." — Bruce J. Biddle and David C. Berliner

Shortly after my brief article on the recent United Way astroturf episode ran, my friend Anthony Cody reached out regarding how Professor Julian Vasquez-Heilig had done some work in the past on proposing a Community Based Accountability framework that seemingly informed California's Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)—at least in part. He asked me to send my thoughts on what that looked like on the ground in Los Angeles. He also sent me links to Vasquez-Heilig's posts Accountability: Are you ready for a new idea? and D.C. are you listening?: A New Local, Community-Based Approach for Accountability. I responded, and was then asked if it was okay to publish my commentary. I requested that I be given a chance to clean the comments up. I decided that rather than make revisions, I would instead annotate my original response.

First I want to say that I support the idea of a Community Based Accountability framework in principle. The micromanaging of everything from curricula all the way to assessments by both the Bush and Obama administrations has been astonishing, and has failed students in every regard. I believe that community based accountability could work in cities where genuine community and parent engagement is present. In Los Angeles we have a very different reality. I was reminded yesterday of the seemingly inexhaustible resources the neoliberal corporate education reformers have while covering an event contrived by the Walton Family Foundation funded Parent Revolution to push their candidates for Los Angeles Unified School Board and State Superintendent of Instruction. We have a local superintendent in John Deasy who is simultaneously a former Gates Foundation executive and a graduate of the Broad Superintendents Academy. Deasy was essentially placed in power by Eli Broad—there was no hiring or veting process prior to his coronation. Broad and Gates also fund the United Way of Greater Los Angeles to the tune of millions of dollars, as they do with many of the Nonprofit Industrial Complex (NPIC) in our city. Between their limitless finances, direct connection with the superintendent, financial ties with opportunistic politicians, and uncritical coverage in the corporate media, the NPIC are able to carry out advocating for the Broad/Gates/Walton agenda with negligible opposition.

Annotated original comments

In theory and principle, LCFF sounds like a great idea. In practice, there has been—and will be—no authentic community input as to how the funds are spent. Deasy made a mistake in the very beginning and had the district run an online poll for how the funds were to be spent. When he saw that adult education and early education topped the list, he pressed the reset button and brought in the Nonprofit Industrial Complex (NPIC) to run the process. The NPIC don't do parent or community engagement, they do control.

When we first heard of LCFF many of us had trepidation. Governor Brown was counterposing it to categorical funding, which protected both some of our most vulnerable students (e.g. Special Needs Children and English Language Learners), and programs like Adult Education—which is vital to our impoverished and immigrant communities. We also saw that early drafts of LCFF were going to bolster funding to the lucrative charter school industry, which wasn't surprising given that Brown is in the charter school business himself. In 2012 we saw what happens to programs when they weren't protected by categorical funding. As soon as Adult Education had been temporarily removed from categorical funding, Deasy callously tried to close down the entire program.

As I noted in my original comments, the District (i.e. Deasy) polled the community for its priorities and didn't like the results. That process, and LCFF in general, is somewhat of a "pick your poison" setup from the beginning anyway. We are presented with a list of budget priorities that are falsely set in competition with each other. We shouldn't have to choose between whether we want more resources for English Language Learners English Language Learner versus arts programs, and so forth. LCFF allows Governor Brown and his fellow politicians off the hook for not fully funding education by letting them say that "the community chose" to eschew a school nurse in lieu of more test preparation computers, etc." Again, we shouldn't have to make choices between say counselors versus nurses, or nurses versus arts, and even that series of false dichotomies assumes that the community would be making those decision in the first place. Dr. Cynthia Liu's timely Local Control Funding Formula Accountability Councils — Did You Get the Memo? exposed how politics in Los Angeles works. Deasy's invitations to create Local Control Accountability Plans (LCAP) were made exclusively for and through the NPIC. Their carefully staged "demonstration" in front of the district was coordinated between Deasy and the foundations he and the NPIC have in common.

I noticed that in the article on Professor Vasquez Heilig's site the person listed some of the NPIC

ACLU, Public Advocates, Children Now, Families in Schools, the Advancement Project, EdTrust-West, Children's Defense Fund, CADRE and Californians for Justice.

Here in Los Angeles the ACLU serves as one of the legal arms of the Broad managed NPICs. Of the others I can attest that Families in Schools, EdTrust-West, and Children's Defense Fund are some of the most anti-public education outfits around. Families in Schools was the biggest advocate for NCLB in Los Angeles, and if you notice, many of my pieces over the years have dealt with them and their long-time director, reactionary Maria Casillas.

Probably my most extensive post on the Families in Schools NPIC was written in 2011. A perfect demonstration of the synergy between Deasy and the NPIC is found in Families in Schools' reactionary Maria Casillas, who has been hired by Deasy twice: first to lead astroturf parent "engagement," and again recently to fill the void left by the disgraced Jaime Aquino of the Pearson PLC iPad scandal fame. EdTrust-West is led by the unabashed teacher hating Arun Ramanathan, whose ideas of "equity" include channeling the late Howard Jarvis—the fringe-right author of Proposition 13—the root cause of all of California's education budget shortfalls. Children's Defense Fund is led by arch-reactionary Jonah Edelman, whose claim to infamy is his proud union busting tirade captured on film at an Aspen Institute event in which he detailed his work with hedge fund managers and large foundations to destroy the Chicago Public Schools system. Hence my real concerns when reading Debra Watkins' response to Vasquez-Heilig saying "I serve on a team comprised of groups." Those groups Watkins discusses do not represent local communities, rather they are the voice of the ruling class plutocrats who fund them through their foundations.

This recent piece on how Los Angeles NPIC control the entire narrative over LCFF funding, really doesn't begin to address how much power they have.

http://k12newsnetwork.com/blog/2014/04/11/united-ways-corporate-npic-astroturf-was-thick-in-front-of-lausd-last-tuesday/

The truth is, there is no group with the funding that can provide any kind of counter narrative. Our local press talks about these groups like they are authentic community voices. The reality is that they are the voice of the foundations that fund them. Deasy has it made. All of his LCFF priorities are "coincidently" the same as the NPICs, and the editorial staff at all the local media. Point out the foundations that are the common thread in all of this, and you're immediately labeled a conspiracy theorist.

The ever eloquent Joanne Barkan provides the best response to the conspiracy theory accusations:

By definition conspiracies are secret and illegal. The ed-reform movement isn't a conspiracy. When people or organizations work together politically in a democracy, it's a coalition or movement. This is true even when—as is the case with the ed-reform movement—huge amounts of money are being spent by mega-foundations and private meetings take place.

I would further add to Barkin's statement that the correct term for ruling class consensus to openly privatize education in order to meet a range of their goals is policy, not conspiracy. The use of the NPIC to further our rulers' agenda's is nothing new either; the watershed book, The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex, is nearly a decade old, and the issues it discusses began at least a half-century before its publication. The truth about the plutocratic oligarchy we live under is now so conspicuous, that even the mainstream corporate media have began discussing it. In Los Angeles this isn't Watkins' "messy" "democracy", but instead a one sided corporate narrative in which community control is just a banal phrase.

There are no grassroots parent or community groups that can compete with the NPIC in terms of getting their voices heard on LCFF's LCAPs. Authentic groups like Coalition for Educational Justice comprise a few dozen members and have minuscule budgets. The only large organizations that traditionally speak for working class people—the labor movement—are missing in action, or worse. Unions like the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, and Service Employees International Union Local 99 are completely complicit in the school privatization project. They have worked closely with the NPIC to push for privately managed charters, discredited value added evaluations, and a host of other neoliberal corporate education reforms. Over the past decade they have consistently endorsed and supported the same school board candidates that have been financed by Eli Broad, Philip Anschutz, Rupert Murdoch, and Mike Bloomberg's Coalition for School Reform. Worse still, their leadership openly supports Deasy. The only union not under the sway of these groups is United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA). UTLA has been entirely ineffective combatting neoliberalism due to bitter sectarian infighting—a situation that doesn't look like it will change any time soon.

If we had vibrant social movements, respect for special needs children, and English language learners, etc., LCFF might have been a good idea. Instead, we're seeing the funds being used according to foundation agendas, the same foundations that control the Department of Education in DC. At the end of the day LCFF will be used to further deprive those already marginalized students of their civil rights. It's not unlike when the South refused to desegregate and needed federal intervention.

Other than a handful of us that write on these issues, there is no organized dissent. Again, how do you compete with the United Way, its backers, and all the groups it funds?

All I can speak for is Los Angeles. Here the same entities that dictate national education policy hold sway over our entire school district. With categorical funding all but gone, our concerns that the safety net for programs crucial to our communities are more than legitimate. The agenda and priorities of the groups controlling the LCAP process are not those of working class people. We see those corporate priorities in Deasy's choice to line Pearson PLC's pockets with bond money that was supposed to repair our crumbling schools. In the absence of genuine struggle, there's little hope that the community will ever be heard.

LAUSD hopeful Sherlett Hendy Newbill and Basketball legend Magic Johnson agree there's no racism allowed in schools

Sherlett Hendy Newbill & legend Magic Johnson agree there's #noracismallowedinschools #LAUSD http://t.co/FXZVcxKXaF pic.twitter.com/dOc5Sj0yuS

— Robert D. Skeels (@rdsathene) May 5, 2014